Add to ORKGThis article reports on the so-called "sons of "Cadder" cases in which the UK Supreme Court has shed further light on the implications of recognising suspects' right to legal advice prior to police questioning. It assesses whether these cases have further improved the position of suspects, and the extent to which they vindicate or repudiate the arguments made in an earlier article in this journal
This article examines the need to reform the UK law of joint enterprise, the scope of which has been...
It is perhaps not surprising that in an age which has witnessed an ever increasing amount of terrori...
In Richard v BBC, a media report revealing that the police were investigating a person in relation t...
The case of Cadder v HM Advocate in 2010 had an instant and seismic effect on Scottish criminal lega...
This article considers the recent case of Cadder v HM Advocate in which the UK Supreme Court found t...
This article compares the model of custodial legal advice provided for under section 58 of PACE and ...
Closed material procedures were originally introduced in the UK to enable courts to hear national se...
In response to problems encountered in the administration of justice in Northern Ireland, the Britis...
Miscarriages of justice within the United Kingdom have received much publicity since the early ninet...
In R v M the Court of Appeal circumvented the retrospective application of the presumption of doli i...
Stop and search can harm young people, damage relations between police and the community and alienat...
This article compares the role of family courts in England and Wales with those of Australia. The ro...
WHO HAS FIRST CLAIM ON “THE LOYALTY OF THE LAW”?Smith v Chief Constable of the Sussex Police (hereaf...
In October 2010, the UK Parliament brought into effect law that replaced the partial defence to murd...
In recent decades, restorative justice has come to occupy an accepted part of many criminal justice ...
This article examines the need to reform the UK law of joint enterprise, the scope of which has been...
It is perhaps not surprising that in an age which has witnessed an ever increasing amount of terrori...
In Richard v BBC, a media report revealing that the police were investigating a person in relation t...
The case of Cadder v HM Advocate in 2010 had an instant and seismic effect on Scottish criminal lega...
This article considers the recent case of Cadder v HM Advocate in which the UK Supreme Court found t...
This article compares the model of custodial legal advice provided for under section 58 of PACE and ...
Closed material procedures were originally introduced in the UK to enable courts to hear national se...
In response to problems encountered in the administration of justice in Northern Ireland, the Britis...
Miscarriages of justice within the United Kingdom have received much publicity since the early ninet...
In R v M the Court of Appeal circumvented the retrospective application of the presumption of doli i...
Stop and search can harm young people, damage relations between police and the community and alienat...
This article compares the role of family courts in England and Wales with those of Australia. The ro...
WHO HAS FIRST CLAIM ON “THE LOYALTY OF THE LAW”?Smith v Chief Constable of the Sussex Police (hereaf...
In October 2010, the UK Parliament brought into effect law that replaced the partial defence to murd...
In recent decades, restorative justice has come to occupy an accepted part of many criminal justice ...
This article examines the need to reform the UK law of joint enterprise, the scope of which has been...
It is perhaps not surprising that in an age which has witnessed an ever increasing amount of terrori...
In Richard v BBC, a media report revealing that the police were investigating a person in relation t...